Who Is The Libercontrarian?
A Bellandean!
Althouse
AnarchAngel
Blog Of The Century Of The Week
Blogger News Network
Cold Fury
Combs Spouts Off
EJECT! EJECT! EJECT!
FreedomSight
John Keyes Photographs
Let's Try Freedom
Lileks
Mathfidl
Publicola
Pueblog USa
red vs. blue.com
Resistance is FUTILE!
Resurrection Song
Vodkapundit
World Wide Rant
visited *loading* times
Trying two new 8mm mauser loads for my new Yugo M48 - 170 grain Speer Semi-Spitzer soft point on Winchester case, CCI 200 large rifle primer, and 50.8 grains of Varget and 50.0 grains of Accurate Arms 2520 in the same setup.
I had some luck with some oddball Remington 185 grain Pointed Soft Points (they have this wacky cannelure fairly high on the bullet; I think it's designed around hunting 8mm rounds like 8mm-'06). Nevertheless, they were gouping around 2.5 inches with iron sights @ 100 yards last weekend, when the shooter was serious about groups and not just screwing off. I failed to document the powder I used to load them; it was 48.0 grains of something. I checked the loadbooks, and that was a fair piece past max for IMR 4064. I wouldn't make a mistake like that; I probably loaded Varget previously and that would be about correct.

I'll also be loading for the Brit gun - a brand-spankin' new No. 4 Mark 2 Irish Contract SMLE rifle that has an amusing "vertical stringing" problem. Look at this target to see what happened with two different powders (H335 and Win 760) on the same bullet and case, all four rounds aimed dead center @100 yards with iron sights:

Pretty annoying, yet surprisingly consistent, aren't they? Why would the Win 760 shoot to the right like that? From my research, I can tell you that the vertical stringing issue is likely a handguard clearance problem. I have to take the rifle apart to see if the handguards are rubbing, then dremel out a clearance around the barrel. There's also a bedding operation I can do to the stock to make it shoot even more accurately; this is not supposed to be particularly hard to do. Somebody else somewere on the web is saying that it has something to do with the nature of the lubrication in the bolt/breech causing some weird motion of the bolt/round as the round enters the chamber. Since I can't imagine that mere lubricant can't have a great effect in an area where the other forces acting on the bolt would be, by comparison, so great, I doubt this could affect the point of impact.
This may not be what you were looking for when you came to Libercontrarian. I admit that my blogging effort is an inconsistent one - politics one day, gun rights issues the next, a technical post about reloading the day after.
This is the way things are around here - messy. Disorganized. Chaotic. That's OK - it's the way I like it.

today
March 2009
February 2009
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004